Tuesday, 31 July 2012
c1929 Model CS1 Norton
Christian in Germany sent these pics of his c1929 Model CS1 Norton. The engine and frame do not originally belong together; the engine was shipped on the 6th of January 1930 to Nystroms in Sweden. We cannot find the frame number in the records. The frame has a few unusual features like an extra lug below the tank in front of the cylinder head (photo above), rear set footrests and the older type of lug for the rear break anchor. All of these could be later additions but perhaps one of the readers has seen these before?
Friday, 27 July 2012
Benzole, Alcohol Fuel and Sir Harry Ricardo
-SG- The mid-twenties tuning notes issued by the Norton factory and recently put on this website refer to Alcohol Fuels RD1 and 2, and PMS2. Not everyone may be aware that these fuels were not like the alcohol racing fuels we are used to today which - unless my scant knowledge is already out of date - are primarily methanol based. Thirteen odd years back I put an article together which appeared in the VMCC magazine and which covers the introduction of RD1 etc in the early twenties.
Benzole, Alcohol Fuel and Sir Harry Ricardo.
Those who have even a mild interest in racing activities between the wars will be aware that 50/50 petrol/benzole was the obligatory fuel for any machine with sporting pretensions while alcohol fuels were extensively used at Brooklands and for sprints etc. Sir Harry Ricardo, who is well known for his contribution to the development of the internal combustion engine - and to Triumph enthusiasts for the Vintage Ricardo model - was much involved in the introduction of both fuels, in conjunction with Shell, and a recent history of the Shell organisation by Stephen Howarth, entitled ‘A Century in Oil,’ gives an interesting insight into the background. Shell International Ltd. has kindly given permission to quote verbatim from this new publication, which was commissioned for the company’s centenary.
“ In the earliest days, Shell Transport’s petrol was made simply by distilling crude oil; Marcus Samuel (founder of Shell) would boast that Shell’s Motor Spirit, unlike those of some other companies, was of such naturally high quality that nothing needed to be added to it. But as engines improved, fuels had to improve too and Shell’s work in this field began in 1917, led by that great engineer Harry Ricardo, whose brilliance later earned him Fellowship of the Royal Society.
In 1917, Ricardo was working for the War Office on the development of engines for tanks and encountered many technical problems. Tanks needed engines which, for the time, were relatively large, producing (on Ricardo’s designs) 150 and later 225 horsepower. These engines had to be simple to maintain and free from both tell-tale exhaust smoke and the danger of stalling on the battlefield.
In combating this, Ricardo concentrated on the phenomenon of what we know know as ‘pinking.’ This occurred when the air/fuel mixture ignited (or as he put it, detonated) prematurely, resulting in a loss of power - a common problem with early tanks, mainly because of the poor quality of fuel. Service fuel supplies were allocated by a War Office committee, so one day, Ricardo presented himself before it to ask for better fuel. But he asked in vain:
'I was given to understand that the best quality petrol was earmarked for aviation; the next best for high-speed staff cars, and the lowest grade for tractors and heavy vehicles, and the Tanks, which only waddled along at walking pace, would have to be content with the dregs of the barrels.'
The committee, composed mainly of senor naval and military officers, was chaired by a civilian, Robert Waley Cohen, by then one of Shell Transport’s directors. Since the committee would not, or could not supply him with better petrol, Ricardo asked for benzole or benzene. He explained that it was more stable and less inclined to detonate than a kerosene-based fuel, so with it, he would be able to increase engine compression ratios, which in turn would provide enhanced power, economy and range. But the committee was still not interested and it was not until after the meeting that Waley Cohen took Ricardo aside and said,’What’s all this stuff about benzole and detonation? I would like to hear more about it.’
Waley Cohen had read chemistry at Cambridge and has sensed there must be something in what Ricardo had said. Over dinner the two men agreed that Shell should send some samples of its different petrols to Ricardo for evaluation. Ricardo found that one of these - from Borneo - could give an engine at least 20% more power - ‘far and away better than all the others,’ he noted. This was so astonishing that he repeated all the tests with another sample of the same fuel, and obtained identical results. Yet what had Shell been doing with it? Burning it as waste, by scores of thousands of barrels, because its specific gravity was deemed too high to be of commercial use. Armed with this revelation, Waley Cohen promptly cabled Borneo to stop the waste and took Ricardo on as a consultant.
So began Shell’s continuing programme of matching fuels to engines and some of Ricardo’s other investigations showed that brilliance can promote both heroism and harmless pleasure, as well as sound business-like products. On his suggestion, Shell’s Borneo petrol was used to make a super aviation fuel. Doing this was costly and quite wasteful, and the product was too scarce for normal aviation use; but it did provide 10% more power from 12-15% less fuel - and it was this fuel which Alcock and Brown used for their pioneering non-stop transatlantic flight in 1919. As Ricardo remarked, they said that even a small increase in power or fuel economy might make all the difference between success and disaster for their enterprise, for it was touch and go whether they could take off with enough fuel for the crossing...
It is easy to imagine the thrill and satisfaction derived from being involved with the success of that historic crossing, and just as easy to understand the enjoyment that came from another of Ricardo’s suggestions. Thinking ‘it might be amusing to concoct a special fuel mixture for racing cars and motor-cycles,’ he put the idea to Robert Waley Cohen, ‘who had no objection; in fact, he, too, thought it would be rather fun.’
From this whim, ‘Shell Racing Spirit’ was developed. It was a blend of ethyl alcohol (supplied by the Distillers Company), benzole, acetone, water and 2% castor oil. The formula was kept confidential, partly because Ricardo wished to patent it and partly because the ‘secret composition’ was a splendid marketing device. But applying for a patent produced a hitch: any competitor could simply analyse the fuel, work out its components and their proportions, and by adjusting these proportions very slightly could make an equally efficient fuel without breaking patent law. Shell Transport’s chief chemist, James Kewley, decided to ‘find some complex organic substance which could both defy analysis and give to the exhaust a peculiar and characteristic smell.’ The answer was to add to the mixture - of all things - a small pinch of finely powdered bone meal!.
It certainly gave the exhaust a distinctive (‘and,’ said Ricardo, ‘I am afraid, a rather repulsive’) odour. It also provoked enormous speculation among competitors, who mostly reckoned a secret wartime development, probably a high explosive, must be involved. Speculation and theories increased when, with Shell’s agreement, the Distillers Company began marketing ‘Discol R,’ a ‘rival fuel,’ - which, in fact, was exactly the same thing but in a differently coloured can. The invented rivalry proved another good marketing device, and Ricardo much enjoyed hearing riders extolling the virtues of one fuel against the other. The deception was an innocent one, because, whatever the can’s colour, the fuel worked outstandingly well: it could produce as much as 30% more power than anything else available. Indeed, with motor-cycles, it was so efficient that after one season of use, in which a Shell-sponsored rider took every prize that was going, the authorities at Brooklands banned it. It cannot be often that a company produces something which is just too good.
After-word: Although the final part of this extract makes a good story, it is not quite a full reflection of the facts! The truth is that alcohol fuels of various types were used at Brooklands throughout the twenties and thirties. What did happen, was that they were banned for use in major UK road races, including the TT, with effect from the end of 1925, although for some now obscure reason, alcohol fuels were permitted again during the thirties in the Manx Grand Prix events. The late Joe Craig expressed the opinion in 1948, that this factor - the banning of alcohol fuels - did much to encourage the development of reliable high performance engines which would run efficiently on petrol - or petrol/benzole.
Writing in 1992, the late Dr. Joe Bayley told me that alcohol was used at Brooklands prior to the Great War, both as a fuel and as an additive. But he went on to say that it was towards the end of the 1922 season that Discol really became popular. RD1 (RD= Racing Discol) was made up of 80% Ethanol, 10% acetone and 10% water. It was mainly used for short races. RD2 was 80% Ethanol, 10% Benzole and 10% Acetone - used mainly for longer races - while PMS2 (Pratt’s Motor Spirit), which JB considered probably the best of the three, was a simple mixture of 80% Ethanol and 20% Benzole. Towards the end of the twenties, Laurence Hartley, the well-known tuner and Ariel exponent, apparently started marketing a racing fuel of his own, based on a very high purity methanol (M100), which gave better results that any of the alcohol fuels mentioned. It was widely used in many branches of motor-cycle sport with much success. -Simon Grigson, 1999-
Postscript: Roger has kindly been in touch to add some very worthwhile comments. He has carried out considerable research into the matter and this is contained in the relevant section of his book. He adds:
Benzole, Alcohol Fuel and Sir Harry Ricardo.
Those who have even a mild interest in racing activities between the wars will be aware that 50/50 petrol/benzole was the obligatory fuel for any machine with sporting pretensions while alcohol fuels were extensively used at Brooklands and for sprints etc. Sir Harry Ricardo, who is well known for his contribution to the development of the internal combustion engine - and to Triumph enthusiasts for the Vintage Ricardo model - was much involved in the introduction of both fuels, in conjunction with Shell, and a recent history of the Shell organisation by Stephen Howarth, entitled ‘A Century in Oil,’ gives an interesting insight into the background. Shell International Ltd. has kindly given permission to quote verbatim from this new publication, which was commissioned for the company’s centenary.
“ In the earliest days, Shell Transport’s petrol was made simply by distilling crude oil; Marcus Samuel (founder of Shell) would boast that Shell’s Motor Spirit, unlike those of some other companies, was of such naturally high quality that nothing needed to be added to it. But as engines improved, fuels had to improve too and Shell’s work in this field began in 1917, led by that great engineer Harry Ricardo, whose brilliance later earned him Fellowship of the Royal Society.
In 1917, Ricardo was working for the War Office on the development of engines for tanks and encountered many technical problems. Tanks needed engines which, for the time, were relatively large, producing (on Ricardo’s designs) 150 and later 225 horsepower. These engines had to be simple to maintain and free from both tell-tale exhaust smoke and the danger of stalling on the battlefield.
In combating this, Ricardo concentrated on the phenomenon of what we know know as ‘pinking.’ This occurred when the air/fuel mixture ignited (or as he put it, detonated) prematurely, resulting in a loss of power - a common problem with early tanks, mainly because of the poor quality of fuel. Service fuel supplies were allocated by a War Office committee, so one day, Ricardo presented himself before it to ask for better fuel. But he asked in vain:
'I was given to understand that the best quality petrol was earmarked for aviation; the next best for high-speed staff cars, and the lowest grade for tractors and heavy vehicles, and the Tanks, which only waddled along at walking pace, would have to be content with the dregs of the barrels.'
The committee, composed mainly of senor naval and military officers, was chaired by a civilian, Robert Waley Cohen, by then one of Shell Transport’s directors. Since the committee would not, or could not supply him with better petrol, Ricardo asked for benzole or benzene. He explained that it was more stable and less inclined to detonate than a kerosene-based fuel, so with it, he would be able to increase engine compression ratios, which in turn would provide enhanced power, economy and range. But the committee was still not interested and it was not until after the meeting that Waley Cohen took Ricardo aside and said,’What’s all this stuff about benzole and detonation? I would like to hear more about it.’
Waley Cohen had read chemistry at Cambridge and has sensed there must be something in what Ricardo had said. Over dinner the two men agreed that Shell should send some samples of its different petrols to Ricardo for evaluation. Ricardo found that one of these - from Borneo - could give an engine at least 20% more power - ‘far and away better than all the others,’ he noted. This was so astonishing that he repeated all the tests with another sample of the same fuel, and obtained identical results. Yet what had Shell been doing with it? Burning it as waste, by scores of thousands of barrels, because its specific gravity was deemed too high to be of commercial use. Armed with this revelation, Waley Cohen promptly cabled Borneo to stop the waste and took Ricardo on as a consultant.
So began Shell’s continuing programme of matching fuels to engines and some of Ricardo’s other investigations showed that brilliance can promote both heroism and harmless pleasure, as well as sound business-like products. On his suggestion, Shell’s Borneo petrol was used to make a super aviation fuel. Doing this was costly and quite wasteful, and the product was too scarce for normal aviation use; but it did provide 10% more power from 12-15% less fuel - and it was this fuel which Alcock and Brown used for their pioneering non-stop transatlantic flight in 1919. As Ricardo remarked, they said that even a small increase in power or fuel economy might make all the difference between success and disaster for their enterprise, for it was touch and go whether they could take off with enough fuel for the crossing...
It is easy to imagine the thrill and satisfaction derived from being involved with the success of that historic crossing, and just as easy to understand the enjoyment that came from another of Ricardo’s suggestions. Thinking ‘it might be amusing to concoct a special fuel mixture for racing cars and motor-cycles,’ he put the idea to Robert Waley Cohen, ‘who had no objection; in fact, he, too, thought it would be rather fun.’
From this whim, ‘Shell Racing Spirit’ was developed. It was a blend of ethyl alcohol (supplied by the Distillers Company), benzole, acetone, water and 2% castor oil. The formula was kept confidential, partly because Ricardo wished to patent it and partly because the ‘secret composition’ was a splendid marketing device. But applying for a patent produced a hitch: any competitor could simply analyse the fuel, work out its components and their proportions, and by adjusting these proportions very slightly could make an equally efficient fuel without breaking patent law. Shell Transport’s chief chemist, James Kewley, decided to ‘find some complex organic substance which could both defy analysis and give to the exhaust a peculiar and characteristic smell.’ The answer was to add to the mixture - of all things - a small pinch of finely powdered bone meal!.
It certainly gave the exhaust a distinctive (‘and,’ said Ricardo, ‘I am afraid, a rather repulsive’) odour. It also provoked enormous speculation among competitors, who mostly reckoned a secret wartime development, probably a high explosive, must be involved. Speculation and theories increased when, with Shell’s agreement, the Distillers Company began marketing ‘Discol R,’ a ‘rival fuel,’ - which, in fact, was exactly the same thing but in a differently coloured can. The invented rivalry proved another good marketing device, and Ricardo much enjoyed hearing riders extolling the virtues of one fuel against the other. The deception was an innocent one, because, whatever the can’s colour, the fuel worked outstandingly well: it could produce as much as 30% more power than anything else available. Indeed, with motor-cycles, it was so efficient that after one season of use, in which a Shell-sponsored rider took every prize that was going, the authorities at Brooklands banned it. It cannot be often that a company produces something which is just too good.
After-word: Although the final part of this extract makes a good story, it is not quite a full reflection of the facts! The truth is that alcohol fuels of various types were used at Brooklands throughout the twenties and thirties. What did happen, was that they were banned for use in major UK road races, including the TT, with effect from the end of 1925, although for some now obscure reason, alcohol fuels were permitted again during the thirties in the Manx Grand Prix events. The late Joe Craig expressed the opinion in 1948, that this factor - the banning of alcohol fuels - did much to encourage the development of reliable high performance engines which would run efficiently on petrol - or petrol/benzole.
Writing in 1992, the late Dr. Joe Bayley told me that alcohol was used at Brooklands prior to the Great War, both as a fuel and as an additive. But he went on to say that it was towards the end of the 1922 season that Discol really became popular. RD1 (RD= Racing Discol) was made up of 80% Ethanol, 10% acetone and 10% water. It was mainly used for short races. RD2 was 80% Ethanol, 10% Benzole and 10% Acetone - used mainly for longer races - while PMS2 (Pratt’s Motor Spirit), which JB considered probably the best of the three, was a simple mixture of 80% Ethanol and 20% Benzole. Towards the end of the twenties, Laurence Hartley, the well-known tuner and Ariel exponent, apparently started marketing a racing fuel of his own, based on a very high purity methanol (M100), which gave better results that any of the alcohol fuels mentioned. It was widely used in many branches of motor-cycle sport with much success. -Simon Grigson, 1999-
Postscript: Roger has kindly been in touch to add some very worthwhile comments. He has carried out considerable research into the matter and this is contained in the relevant section of his book. He adds:
Discol was the product of the Hammersmith DIStillery Co. Ltd and their January 1923 letter to Motor Cycle must be regarded as authoritative in terms of the meaning of PMS as Power Methylated Spirits and of their composition. They were probably the sole source of supply of the rectified spirit for use in fuels using the Discol name but which were mainly hydrocarbon based in much the same way as modern petrol. I am not sure whether RD1/2 were available before PMS1/2 but certainly the letter confirms that PMS1/2 were available from 1922 and initially contained neither castor oil nor acetone. I suspect that Shell marketed PMS as Shell R and that Ricardo developed RD1/2 with the additives after that. I also thought that RD stood for Ricardo Discol.
The mixtures evolved with time and by the thirties incorporated methanol and acetone. RD2 would have used around 25% benzole which is why the acetone was introduced to maintain miscibility. Methanol tends to absorb water which is why it needs the acetone which would also allow water to be added to give a greater charge cooling effect.
Tuesday, 24 July 2012
c1909 Model 3 1/2 HP Norton
-JdK- From George's book, a picture of a c1909 Model 3 1/2 HP Norton at Brooklands.
-George- The picture was taken at the easter meeting at Brooklands in 1909. From left to right: Pratt on a Norton, Godfrey on a Rex and Femi on a TT Triumph. The number plate on the Norton (O164) was the same as on Pa Norton's Big 4 combination!
-Roger- I can find no trace of a Norton racing at Brooklands before 1910 and I am not convinced that this was taken at a race meeting. The lack of spectators in the spectators' enclosure on the other side of the track supports this. In 1909 the BARC official events would have used colours for the identification of riders but all of the riders are wearing the same clothing. The Norton has the 1904 registration O164 which indicates that it was a works machine and it was in use by the factory for a long time.
-John- The Rex has been modified for use at Brooklands as the front forks are solid with no springing at all from a c1904 machine, even though the machine in the picture is either 1909 or 1910.
Saturday, 21 July 2012
1929 Model 18 Trials Norton
-SG- Here's a photo Peter Roydhouse sent me showing Graham Goodman and his Norton - more or less a 1929 Model 18 of which other photos were taken during the late twenties (like the one below sent by Roger) - with which he was 'Best 500' in the 1930 Scottish 6 Days Trial. The chaps with him, McColl and McQueen were, with Graham, joint winners of the Team Award. Not sure what they rode, but possibly McQueen might have been on a Norton. He was a leading Speedway rider at Edinburgh speedway at about this time and not long after emigrated to the USA taking a 1930 racing spec. CS1 with him. Note the highly polished shoes and generally smart attire! What a scruffy lot we are these days by comparison!
Wednesday, 18 July 2012
Factory Tuning Instructions
(click this link for a PDF)
-SG- Peter Thomson in New Zealand has kindly provided these copies of Tuning Instructions issued by the Norton works in the mid-twenties (late 1924 - early 1925). These are worthy of attention by anyone who wonders about the performance private owners managed to extract from their Model 18s at the time. Note the suggested substitution of an exhaust cam for the regular inlet version - this would probably have been in the era of the '90' cams - and also how to increase the compression ratio by machining the cylinder base. The notes came to Peter through descendants of a leading rider in the Otago region of New Zealand (south of the South Island) called Josh Mewhinney. Josh was successful in beach racing and hill climbs in the twenties and thirties.
Monday, 16 July 2012
More on the 1930 Model DT Norton
(To read: place pointer on picture, right-mouse click and select 'open in new window')
-SG- The recent print of the Dirt Track (DT) Norton reminds me to send in the pages above. Not much seems to have appeared in print about the 1930 DT Norton - anyone seen any factory leaflets? - and I found this lot in Judges 'Modern Motor Cycles', a three volume work published in 1932 or 1933. The section on DT machines was written by W C Haycraft, author of of various 'marque' books publshed by Pitmans (incuding at least two on Nortons) as well as 'Speed and how to obtain it'.
Saturday, 14 July 2012
c1928 Model 19 Norton and Bowden damper
Christian in Germany sent these pictures of his c1928 Model 19 Norton
-SG- The bike seems to be a mixture of parts but actually looks quite correct for a 1928 Model 19 apart from the brake pedal on the right hand side. The engine number ES419XX is correct for an entry showing a 588cc ES2 engine (an engine only) shipped to the Swedish Norton agents, Per Nystrom in November 1928. Photos of the internals of the timing chest show ES2 cam followers and the W7 (Model 18/19/16H/etc) cams; normal ES2 cams have a much smaller base circle diameter. I guess someone has simply put Model 18 cams into the ES2 engine and put a standard (pre-1930) outer cover onto the timing chest taking - note - the 1928/1929 oil pump, so that it could be used in the flat tank frame with magneto out front. The head is ES2 as it has a left handed exhaust port and ES2 exhaust valve lifter mechanism. The 588 flat tank frames like this one have 588 stamped on the right hand side of the saddle lug and the frame number on the left hand side.
Interesting to see the unusual Bowden steering damper (below): looks complex and not seen one before. They did not sell as well as the Andre dampers usually fitted to Nortons.
-SG- The bike seems to be a mixture of parts but actually looks quite correct for a 1928 Model 19 apart from the brake pedal on the right hand side. The engine number ES419XX is correct for an entry showing a 588cc ES2 engine (an engine only) shipped to the Swedish Norton agents, Per Nystrom in November 1928. Photos of the internals of the timing chest show ES2 cam followers and the W7 (Model 18/19/16H/etc) cams; normal ES2 cams have a much smaller base circle diameter. I guess someone has simply put Model 18 cams into the ES2 engine and put a standard (pre-1930) outer cover onto the timing chest taking - note - the 1928/1929 oil pump, so that it could be used in the flat tank frame with magneto out front. The head is ES2 as it has a left handed exhaust port and ES2 exhaust valve lifter mechanism. The 588 flat tank frames like this one have 588 stamped on the right hand side of the saddle lug and the frame number on the left hand side.
Interesting to see the unusual Bowden steering damper (below): looks complex and not seen one before. They did not sell as well as the Andre dampers usually fitted to Nortons.
-Martin- This Bowden steering damper was used extensively on works Rudges and the principal feature which distinguishes it from others is that it is remotely operated by a cable that allow the rider to adjust the damping effect without removing either hand from the handlebars. I think this tells you something about the handling of Rudges more than about the benefits of the Bowden steering damper. To quote from the delightful 'Rudge Book of the Road' published in 1927, in a chapter headed 'The TT from the Saddle', '... you plunge down to Craig-ny-bar. Machine ahead of you. Can you pass him? Prudence says NO. He's jumping about all over the road - wrestling with occasional bursts of speed wobble. So are you! If you try to pass you'll either hit him or go up the bank'. I think I would rather be riding a Norton!!
-Roger- Attached (click this link for a PDF) is the patent explaining how the Bowden steering damper works and which gives the correct application number together with the dates. The application was made in September 1927 and granted in November 1928. The plate on the damper therefore indicates that it was made between these dates and so was probably fitted from new.
Wednesday, 11 July 2012
Noel Webby, 1925 Model 18 Norton
-SG- The posting for 17/4/2010 shows a 1925 Model 18 in decidedly sporting trim with rear brake removed and open pipe (reproduced above). While the date is correct, it has now been revealed that the caption was not. The chap on the bike is Noel Webby of Blenheim in New Zealand and the occasion, winning various events (three firsts and Championship) at the Hastings Motor Cycle Club event, probably in June 1925.
I am indebted to Peter Thomson of Thomson Motorcycle Museum, near Palmerston North in NZ, for the above information and for the attached Norton advert from Motor Cycling, which mentions Mr. Webby’s successful ‘day at the races’. Peter is a Harley expert, as well as having a wonderful collection of interesting machines and a vast and comprehensive archive. He has identified the outfit in the back-ground as a 1925 Harley with registration number expiring in June 1926.
As mentioned in other posts, grass racing in NZ was, at the time, carried out on horse racing tracks and racing on cinder tracks had not yet appeared on the motor cycle sporting scene.
At the time the photo was taken Noel worked and raced bikes for Alan Woodman who had a motorcycle shop in Blenheim. Why, on this particular occasion, Noel was riding a Norton is unclear as he was usually riding one of Alan Woodman's specials which were all called 'Excuse Me.' Alan himself - though not noted for any Norton connections - was a man of great character. He lost a leg in practise for the 1911 TT but, nothing daunted, returned to NZ to pursue a very successful career racing motor-cycles and, later, speed boats.
Tuesday, 10 July 2012
Frank Farrington (alias RADCO) and his Norton
(to download a larger version of these pages; position pointer over picture, right mouse click and choose 'open in new screen' or similar)
-SG- Those with a long term interest in Vintage bikes will probably have come across articles by ‘RADCO’ which appeared in various publications over several years. The long series on re-building and re-furbishing the machines of yesteryear which appeared in the Vintage Motor Cycle Club’s monthly magazine from 1982 to 1989 later appeared in book form as the Vintage Motor Cyclist’s Workshop. I can recommend this volume which has been out of print for some years but which may be re-issued soon.
Although Frank Farrington (alias RADCO) re-built many machines over the years, during the late fifties/early sixties he owned and used to good effect in Vintage races, Hill-climbs and on the road, a mid-twenties Model 18. This he had obtained in a somewhat sad state from an enthusiast in Lancashire for the princely sum of £7.50. It had been languishing in the original owner’s coal shed for over thirty years. Once re-built, he applied to his local tax authority for a registration number for it and after some discussions with a friendly clerk, was granted – so he told me – the registration number B49.
Frank was bitten by the Vintage racing bug and by the time he had finished with it, B49 was a flyer and was one of the few Vintage machines (at the time there was no class for post-vintage bikes in speed events) to be timed at well over 100 mph. Its performance was undoubtedly aided by Frank’s home brewed cams which gave valve timing very close to that of a Speedway JAP, as well as polished internals, larger valves and a high compression piston.
With the passage of time, Frank moved on to other machines and the Norton was sold, together with the very nice TT Hughes sidecar which was attached to it from time to time. I am glad to say the outfit still exists and appears from time to time albeit no longer in its state of racing tune and without its desirable and valuable number plate! Frank died a few months back aged 77 and these few lines are written as a tribute to a real Vintage enthusiast. I hope he would take as a compliment the reproduction on this site of his entertaining Norton anecdote from Classic Mechanics.
Sunday, 8 July 2012
1930 DT Norton
-SG- Above a photo of Frank Varey with his 1930 DT Norton with which he had a few successes before moving on to Rudges and other 'speedway irons.' He had a successful career on the cinders ending up post war as manager of Sheffield speedway team. He also seems to have had a fancy for fast road bikes - see earlier photo of him and his 1930 CS1 Norton. Photos of the DT Norton are few and this is quite a good one as it shows well the reduced magneto chain housing length - just one of the special features of these twin port engines.
Friday, 6 July 2012
1931 Model 18 Norton
-JdK- This 1931 Model 18 has recently been sold in The Netherlands. Not the most exciting or desirable Norton ever but very interesting nevertheless. Tt seems to be highly original and untouched but probably is based on a 16H!. One of the last models to use the Enfield rear hub, Horton front hub and Sturmey-Archer gearbox, it does already contain Norton's own front forks instead of Webb's product; one of the first Nortons to have the magdyno behind the engine but still with the left-hand exhaust and inverted levers.
Thursday, 5 July 2012
1929 Sturmey-Archer brochure
-SG- Here is a scan of the 1929 Sturmey-Archer CS gearbox manual / partslist. Much of the content is the same as the 1926 version but the last pages cover the 1929 and 1930 gear change parts specifically made for Nortons.
Wednesday, 4 July 2012
1927 Model 25 Norton
-SG- A not too good photo of this very original bike has appeared before but the owner has just sent in these two rather better ones. The last photo shows the inside of the oil pump cover casting; all main aluminium castings in this engine have the same internal stamping numbers.
Sunday, 1 July 2012
Sturmey-Archer footchange
-SG- Here's a scan of the only leaflet I have ever seen of the Sturmey-Archer footchange. It was published end 1931 judging by the text. The earliest S-A footchange, as fitted to the works 1929 CS1s, differs considerably in that it relies on the existing disc type control parts for actual gear selection rather than the substantial and more effective spring loaded plunger (part BS132) used on this later design. The 1929 version was prone to heavy wear and the only one I have had anything to do with needed a lot of work to get it to function correctly - and stay in gear! I do not think there was a leaflet on this early version but if anyone has one - or a copy - please get in touch with us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)